In MTSS, which situation would most likely trigger a comprehensive evaluation?

• A. The student shows strong progress with interventions across domains.
• B. The student fails to respond to targeted interventions across multiple domains, prompting a referral for a comprehensive evaluation.
• C. A parent request alone triggers an evaluation.
• D. A district-wide policy requires evaluation for all students.

Answer: (B)

In MTSS, decisions are driven by data gathered from progress monitoring across tiers. When a student shows little or no meaningful progress despite well-supported, evidence-based interventions across multiple domains, it signals that the current supports aren’t sufficient and a comprehensive evaluation is needed to determine if there is a disability and what services are appropriate. A comprehensive evaluation collects information from multiple sources to understand strengths and needs across academics, behavior, and other areas, guiding eligibility and help planning.

Progress with targeted interventions across domains would indicate adequate response, not a need for evaluation. A parent request can initiate a process, but MTSS relies on data about response to interventions as the trigger. A district-wide policy to evaluate all students isn’t aligned with MTSS practice, which centers on data-driven referrals based on individual progress.